Don Colburn recently took a buyout from The Oregonian after a 33-year career as a newspaper reporter. He has published two award-winning poetry collections: Another Way to Begin and As If Gravity Were a Theory. His new chapbook, Because You Might Not Remember, is forthcoming from Finishing Line Press. 

 

Read more from Don Colburn:

Coach

Maybe, Just Maybe

 

Back to: Table of Contents

 

Notes of a Cross-Training Writer

by Don Colburn

 

For 33 years, I have made my living as a newspaper reporter, writing prose. But I also write poems, which is why I have the gumption to call myself a cross-training writer.

     I didn’t pay much attention to poetry until I was nearly 40. No disrespect – I admired poets from afar – but I didn’t think they had much to do with my work or my life. After all, I was a newspaper guy, reporting on the “real world.” Plus, I was pretty sure poems were impossible to write.

     Now I know better. I also know that poetry has made me a better prose writer.

     Walt Whitman, better known as the great American poet than as a newspaper editor for the Brooklyn Eagle, said in 1852: "The true poem is the daily paper." I don’t quite believe that. You can't always trust Whitman, any more than you can always trust any writer or newspaper editor. This is, after all, a man who reviewed his own poetry in the newspaper – anonymously. And – need I say? – favorably. I’m not even sure that Walt himself believed his daily paper was a true poem, although I think I know what he meant. He meant nothing is off-limits to poetry, and he wanted a poetry that gets out of the classroom into the street to encompass the whole world and, like his own ego, contains multitudes.

     So let’s grant Whitman his poetic license, while acknowledging some obvious differences between poems and newspapers. Journalists aren’t supposed to make things up. Novelists and poets usually don’t write on deadline. Most news stories are in third person; many poems aren’t. In prose, the computer (or the page margin) decides where the lines end, and in poetry, the writer decides. (That's more important than nonpoets may realize.) In news writing, you try to know what you're going to say before you say it, while in poetry, you try not to.

     But think of what poetry and journalism have in common. To begin with: words and the human condition. Also: concision, precision and clarity. To my mind, those sharings outweigh logistical differences such as deadlines and fact-checking, newsprint and the shape of lines. What’s more, the two kinds of writing can inform each other. Paying closer attention to the sound and play of language and the nuances of words can help a news story come closer to telling the truth. And poetry is not an escape from the world, but another way of apprehending it.

     Journalism and poetry have become for me two ways of reporting on the world, two means of truth-seeking and truth-telling. Neither holds a monopoly on what we glibly call the real world.

     William Carlos Williams, the 20th century New Jersey poet and pediatrician, delivered hundreds of babies and wrote hundreds of poems and said that finally it was hard for him to differentiate between those two kinds of work. He also wrote, in a poem called “Asphodel, That Greeny Flower”:

 

                                      It is difficult

                  to get the news from poems

                            yet men die miserably every day

                                      for lack

                  of what is found there.

 

     It’s not just that one type of writer gets to invent things and the other doesn’t. Both journalists and fiction writers make stories from. In a deft reversal, Vladimir Nabokov once said that the ideal writer combines the passion of the scientist with the precision of the poet. Gabriel Garcia Marquez, the Nobel laureate who is renowned for his “magical” style of fiction, also wrote an occasional newspaper column in his native Colombia. "Whether I'm working in journalism or literature," he said, "I'm always describing the same reality.”

     Years ago, while working as a reporter for The Washington Post, I joined a Master of Fine Arts program in creative writing. To my surprise, many of the writerly issues that came up as we critiqued poems in workshops were the same as came up when I sat down in the newsroom with my editor to go over a medical story. Clarity. Authority. Accuracy. Drama. Pace. Tone of voice. Redundancy. Does it flow? Is it too slow getting under way? What's at stake here? Does it leave the reader out or invite the reader in? Where does it bog down or go flat? I just don't get it. Who's speaking here? Where are we?

     It has always intrigued me that in the newsroom we all use that word "story" to describe what we do. Nobody says "article" much. If we're sounding a little precious, we say we're working on a "piece." But mostly we say story. So do fiction writers and even some poets. So do parents reading to their children. So do campers around the fire, neighbors over the back fence, riders on the bus. It's no accident. Tell me a story.

     "In poetry everything is permitted," wrote the Chilean poet Nicanor Parra. "With only this condition, of course: You have to improve on the blank page."

     That one condition gets complicated, but it holds for all writers, no matter what form we write in: poetry, news, novel, short story, memoir, essay, diary, letter, blog. Whatever we write must improve on blankness. Made up or not, it must ring clear and true.

     There’s poetry in the world’s news, and news in its poems. Writers – and readers – must stay alert to both. As William Carlos Williams put it in another poem, “January Morning,” addressed to an old woman, possibly his mother:

 

I wanted to write a poem
that you would understand.
For what good is it to me
if you can't understand it?
          But you got to try hard –

 

Copyright 2010 ~ A River & Sound Review ~ Serious Literature with an Unpretentious Soul ~ Poetry ~ Fiction ~ Nonfiction ~ Humor ~ Podcast ~ Music ~ More